Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1585 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4800MQ - 344 vs 336 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
344
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |