Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770K is 1099 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-875K - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-4770K - CA$112.0 vs CA$169.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4770K - CA$0.74 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$169
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
152
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |