Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-3770T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than Core i7-3770T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3770T - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770T - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
605
51.79794520547946%
Multi-Core
1964
33.89713496720746%
Intel Core i7-3770T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |