Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 2641 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 325 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - CA$44.99 vs CA$350.0
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74777 minutes ago
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74777 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
92.21556886227546%
Multi-Core
1051
45.30172413793103%
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |