Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 150 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$339.0 vs CA$369.9
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$2.26 vs CA$2.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 24 vs 20 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.91/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
91%
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |