Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1840 - 219 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - CA$41.21 vs CA$321.84
- Up to 84% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-10700KF - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$321.84
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$321.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
177
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |