Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - CA$194.24 vs CA$398.88
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
93.63636363636364%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
73.87729285262492%
Multi-Core
5794
82.65335235378032%
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |