Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8300 - 360 vs 318 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - CA$83.46 vs CA$225.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-9600K - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
360
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$225
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
318
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |