Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1551 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4370 - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - CA$85.99 vs CA$225.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-9600K - CA$0.57 vs CA$1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$225
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
150
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |