Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - CA$200.16 vs CA$218.95
- Up to 5% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-9500 - CA$1.56 vs CA$1.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500 - 16 vs 6 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$218.95
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
128
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |