Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 214 days older than Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-8400T - 234 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 16 vs 6 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
234
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
94.09246575342466%
Multi-Core
3884
67.03486365205384%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |