Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 66 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 195 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 112 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - CA$200.16 vs CA$387.75
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7640X - CA$1.11 vs CA$1.99 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.99/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$387.75
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$387.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |