Buy on Amazon
CA$250
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 240 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-7400T - 216 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - CA$200.16 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i5-7400T - CA$0.93 vs CA$1.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Intel BX80677I57400T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7400T Processor
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor (YD190XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
