Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 791 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - CA$194.24 vs CA$244.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
99.40119760479041%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
98.89923793395428%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |