Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6500 is 791 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$139.27 vs CA$200.98
- Up to 30% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.69 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
69%
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |