Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 1551 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - CA$194.24 vs CA$217.54
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$217.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
164
99.39393939393939%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
93.06772908366534%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |