Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 2600 - 672 vs 527 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$142.72 vs CA$2360.47
- Up to 92% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.27 vs CA$3.51 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.51/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.47
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
527
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |