Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4090 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Valorant than Core i7-2700K - 885 vs 702 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$135.68 vs CA$2360.48
- Up to 93% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.19 vs CA$2.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
885
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.67/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.48
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
702
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$135.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$135.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |