Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 21% better in Saints Row than FX-8320 - 176 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$111.14 vs CA$299.59
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$299.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |