Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - CA$111.14 vs CA$138.07
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 205% better in League of Legends than FX-8320 - 174 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Buy for CA$138.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |