Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 20% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1840 - 383 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$41.21 vs CA$314.89
- Up to 84% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-12500 - CA$0.13 vs CA$0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-12500 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
383
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
15.853658536585366%
Price, CA$
CA$314.89
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$314.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4486 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
319
83.28981723237598%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
21.852012115967113%
Multi-Core
854
9.406322282189668%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |