Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10320 - 140 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$196.23 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 27% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10320 - CA$1.4 vs CA$1.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5288 minutes ago
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |