Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the more expensive Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10320 - 594 vs 575 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$246.41 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
594
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$246.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$246.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |