Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G6900 - 428 vs 424 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$112.98 vs CA$222.88
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-10600KF - CA$0.27 vs CA$0.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
428
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18788 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
424
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18788 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |