Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2516 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 24% better in Dota 2 than FX-6100 - 203 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - CA$98.43 vs CA$160.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i3-9100 - CA$0.6 vs CA$0.79 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$160
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$160 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
164
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |