Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4160 - 249 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 44 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
245
98.39357429718876%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.55319148936171%
Multi-Core
2072
21.5407006965381%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |