Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1897 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 177 vs 171 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76638 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |