Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 995 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 5 1400 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - CA$87.08 vs CA$98.88
- Up to 10% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i3-4160 - CA$0.44 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15195 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
199
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |