Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 588 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Celeron G3900 - 728 vs 694 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - CA$66.34 vs CA$87.08
- Up to 17% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 5 1400 - CA$0.1 vs CA$0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
728
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
83%
Price, CA$
CA$87.08
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$87.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15480 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |