Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1352 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G4900 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - CA$49.99 vs CA$98.88
- Up to 50% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-4160 - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.52 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16832 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |