Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1544 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3250 - 137 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
45.54794520547945%
Multi-Core
1130
19.502934069727303%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |