Buy on Amazon
CA$67.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 1093 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
