Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3240 - 136 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 51 vs 55 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1930 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |