Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1896 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3110M - 223 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 24 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |