Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2890 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 27% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3110M - 193 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$330
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7624 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |