Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2040 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3110M - 277 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
277
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |