Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3900 - 222 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-14100 - CA$42.99 vs CA$221.19
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-14100 - CA$0.22 vs CA$1.0 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$221.19
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$221.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
192
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |