Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dishonored 2 than FX-6300 - 272 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$66.51 vs CA$218.94
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.8 per FPS
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
272
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$218.94
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13902 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
255
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13892 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |