Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G6900 - 178 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$112.98 vs CA$237.14
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.68 vs CA$1.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.33/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$237.14
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$237.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
166
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |