Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield V than FX-8150 - 268 vs 207 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$87.12 vs CA$182.97
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.42 vs CA$0.68 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
268
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$182.97
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$182.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
207
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |