Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$79.99 vs CA$564.18
- Up to 85% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.15 vs CA$0.97 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-10105F - 582 vs 535 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
535
91.92439862542955%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
582
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
15.463917525773196%
Price, CA$
CA$564.18
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
53.26007326007326%
Multi-Core
4472
25.971310761368255%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |