Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$99.99 vs CA$469.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.44 vs CA$1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-10105F - 240 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.96/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$469.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |