Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-14700 - CA$99.99 vs CA$563.95
- Up to 79% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-14700 - CA$0.29 vs CA$1.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10105F - 401 vs 350 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
350
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
401
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$563.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$563.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-14700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |