Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 514 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - CA$89.99 vs CA$700.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10980XE - CA$0.79 vs CA$6.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10105F - 116 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 36 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
114
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8162 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.03/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$700
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 18 |
8 | Threads | 36 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |