Buy on Amazon
CA$49.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - CA$49.99 vs CA$255.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-10600 - CA$0.26 vs CA$1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G4900 - 211 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
192
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$255
19%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
