Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 740 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$33.99 vs CA$600.75
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - 234 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75914 minutes ago
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.59530791788856%
Multi-Core
992
10.89870358163041%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |