Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1031 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$600.75 vs CA$758.34
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$1.09 vs CA$1.27 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-7920X - 599 vs 553 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
553
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13370 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
599
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$758.34
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$758.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |