Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 963 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$600.75 vs CA$699.84
- Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900K - CA$4.96 vs CA$5.6 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
121
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13690 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.6/FPS
88%
Price, CA$
CA$699.84
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$699.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |