Buy on Amazon
CA$67.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 1484 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G3900 - 145 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
37.363344051446944%
Multi-Core
992
16.957264957264957%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
