Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 163 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
94.47852760736197%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
60.71055381400209%
Multi-Core
992
50.22784810126583%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |