Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2342 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 33% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G1820 - 158 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.90383365821962%
Multi-Core
825
17.833981841763944%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
